How Italy, South Korea Differ In Tackling Coronavirus Outbreak Coronavirus News Italy

In Italy, millions are locked to the other end of also more than 1,000 people have died from the coronavirus.

But within South Korea, which was beat by the disease at about the same time, only a few thousand are quarantined also 67 people died.

More:

The story on the two outbreaks illustrates a difference within approach. 

Italy started out testing widely, in those days narrowed the focus so that now, authorities do not have to process hundreds on thousands on tests. But there's a trade-off: They can't see what's coming also are trying to curb the movements on the country's unified population on 60 million people to contain the disease.

Coronavirus: Too delayed to stop? | UpFront (24:55)

In South Korea, authorities are testing hundreds on thousands on people intended infections also tracking potential carriers like detectives, using moving phone also satellite technology.

Both countries saw their first cases on the disease called COVID-19 within delayed January.

South Korea has since reported nearly 8,000 confirmed cases, after testing more than 222,000 people.

In contrast, Italy has more than 12,000 confirmed cases after carrying out more than 73,000 tests supported by an unspecified number on people.

Epidemiologists declare it is not possible to compare the numbers directly. But some declare the different outcomes point to an important insight: Aggressive also constant testing is a powerful tool intended fighting the virus.

Jeremy Konyndyk, a senior policy fellow at the Center intended Global Development within Washington, said extensive testing can give countries a better picture on the amount on an outbreak. When testing within a country is limited, he said, the authorities have to grip bolder actions to limit the group on people.

"I'm uncomfortable with enforced lockdown-type group restrictions," said Konyndyk. "China did that, however China is able to do that. China has a population that will comply with that."

Previous lessons

Italy also South Korea are more than 5,000 miles (8,000 km) apart, however there are a few similarities when it comes to coronavirus.

Both countries' main outbreaks were initially clustered within smaller cities or towns, rather than within a major metropolis - which meant the disease quickly threatened local health services.

Both confirmed their first cases after doctors decided to ignore testing guidelines.

South Korea, which has a slightly smaller population than Italy at about 50 million people, has around 29,000 people within self-quarantine. It has imposed lockdowns supported by some facilities also at least one apartment complex beat hardest by outbreaks. But so far no unified regions have been cut off.

Seoul says it is building supported by lessons learned from an outbreak on Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) within 2015 also working to make as much details available as possible to the public.

South Korea is also enforcing a law that grants the government wide authority to access data: CCTV footage, GPS tracking data from phones also cars, credit card transactions, immigration entry information, also other personal details on people confirmed to have an infectious disease.

The authorities can in those days make some on this public, so any person who may have been exposed can get themselves - or their friends also family members - tested.

Coronavirus: What is a pandemic also how will things change? (02:14)

In addition to helping work out who to test, South Korea's data-driven systems help hospitals manage their pipeline on cases.

People found confident are placed within self-quarantine also monitored remotely through an app or checked regularly within telephone calls until a infirmary bedstead becomes available. When this occurs, an ambulance picks the person up also takes them to a infirmary with air-sealed isolation rooms. 

This approach comes at the cost on some privacy. South Korea's system is an intrusive mandatory measure that depends supported by people surrendering what, intended many within Europe also the US, would be a fundamental right on privacy.

"Traditional responses such as locking to the other end of affected areas also isolating patients can be only modestly effective, also may cause problems within open societies, says South Korea's Deputy Minister intended Health also Welfare Kim Gang-lip.

In South Korea's experience, he told reporters supported by Monday, lockdowns mean people participate smaller within tracing contacts they may have had. "Such an approach," he said, "is close-minded, coercive also inflexible."

 

Bagikan Artikel ini